Thomas Barrack, Trump fundraiser, indicted on lobbying charge

WASHINGTON — Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a close friend of former President Donald Trump and one of his top 2016 campaign fundraisers, was indicted on Tuesday morning on federal charges of violating a federal law requiring lobbyists for foreign interests to disclose their work to the Justice Department.

Federal prosecutors and the FBI have been investigating Barrack for nearly three years, focusing on whether he tried to sway Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign or his administration on behalf of Persian Gulf nations with huge stakes in United States policy.

The inquiry was overseen by prosecutors in the public integrity section of U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. In an interview two years ago, a spokesman for Barrack said he had acted as an independent intermediary between Persian Gulf leaders and the Trump campaign and administration, not on behalf of foreign officials or entities.

The indictment charged Barrack and two other men with failing to register as agents of the United Arab Emirates government. The other two men charged were Matthew Grimes, a former top executive at Barrack’s company, and Rashid al-Malik Alshahhi, an Emirati businessman who is close to the UAE rulers.

Barrack’s real estate and private equity firm, Colony Capital, benefited from substantial investments from Saudi Arabia and the UAE In the three years after Trump became the Republican Party’s nominee for president in July 2016, Colony Capital received about $1.5 billion from those two Persian Gulf counties through investments or other transactions. Of that, about $474 million came from sovereign wealth funds controlled by their governments.

Barrack, 74, has been friends with Trump since the 1980s. He helped raise money for Trump’s first presidential campaign and ran his transition team after Trump won. But he was perhaps best known for leading Trump’s inaugural committee, which raised $107 million — the most money ever collected and spent to celebrate an inauguration.

Critics claimed the committee became a hub for peddling access to foreign officials or business leaders, or those acting on their behalf, but investigations by several local jurisdictions into the committee’s activities petered out with no charges filed.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Source: Read Full Article