AstraZeneca Vaccine Could Be More Effective If Second Shot Delayed, Researchers Say
A single dose of a vaccine created by Oxford University and AstraZeneca can provide significant protection against contracting COVID-19 if its second dose is delayed by three months, researchers announced Tuesday, findings that could allow countries to vaccinate many more people with their first shots with less fear that they won’t have enough on hand for a second jab.
In a preliminary study, which is being peer-reviewed at The Lancet, researchers analyzed data from more than 17,000 participants in trials of the drug in the United Kingdom, Brazil and South Africa. The study found one dose of the vaccine was 76% effective at protecting against COVID-19 — after an initial three weeks to build immunity — until up to three months after the shot. Protection rose to 82% after the second dose.
Comparatively, trial participants who got the two shots less than six weeks apart showed effectiveness declined to only 55%.
More important, the study found the AstraZeneca vaccine had the “potential” to reduce the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 by 67%, a reduction, researchers said, that would be “substantial” if confirmed. Scientists have been working to determine if any vaccines both protect a patient from the virus and prevent the patient from transmitting the virus even after inoculation. If vaccines protect patients from COVID-19 but those patients could still transmit the coronavirus, the need to socially distance and wear masks will continue.
A vaccine that protected a patient and also prevented transmission would be a critical tool in the fight against the pandemic.
The AstraZeneca vaccine has drawn scrutiny after initial data released last year that found it was 62% effective in two doses included an odd disclaimer: Patients who were accidentally given a half-strength first dose saw the vaccine’s efficacy rise to as much as 90%. The New York Times reported scientists initially thought the dosage may have caused the discrepancies but have since concluded the time between doses is more likely the cause.
The findings may bolster health advice in the United Kingdom that would see as many people as possible get the first dose of vaccines even if it means delaying the second doses.
“Vaccination programs aimed at vaccinating a large proportion of the population with a single dose, with a second dose given after a 3 month period is an effective strategy for reducing disease, and may be the optimal for rollout of a pandemic vaccine when supplies are limited in the short term,” the researchers wrote.
The results do not affect any conversations around other vaccines, including the Pfizer and Moderna inoculations. The study also does not look at how well the vaccine works on new variants of COVID-19, notably strains in the U.K. and South Africa.
The U.S. is currently waiting for clinical trial data from a 30,000-person study of the AstraZeneca vaccine that includes a large number of Americans. If the results provide enough safety data, AstraZeneca could seek emergency authorization for its vaccine in early March, the Times added.
The U.S. government has a contract to buy up to 300 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Novavax also said last week that its vaccine was more than 89% effective at preventing COVID-19, although the company added it was not as effective against the South African variant.
A HuffPost Guide To Coronavirus
- Is it safe to see people who have gotten the coronavirus vaccine?
- What it means if your partner tests positive for COVID-19 but you don’t.
- How worried should you be about the new strains of coronavirus?
- The unexpected challenges of co-parenting during a pandemic.
- 19 things we took for granted pre-pandemic but now miss.
- Find all that and more on our coronavirus hub page.
As COVID-19 cases rise, it’s more important than ever to remain connected and informed. Join the HuffPost community today. (It’s free!)
Source: Read Full Article